Epic sepsis prediction model
Released: TBC
Can you improve this page?
Share your insights with us
An algorithm to predict whether or not patients with infections have contracted sepsis has been discovered to have missed about two-thirds of actual cases, rarely found cases medical staff did not notice, and frequently issued false alarms.
Electronic health record company Epic Systems' Epic Sepsis Model is used by hundreds of hospitals across the US and is marketed as being 76 percent accurate.
Accuracy, transparency
However, a June 2021 study published in JAMA Internal Medicine by University of Michigan researchers analysing a retrospective sample of over 27,000 adult Michigan Medicine patients concluded the algorithm is only correct 63 percent of the time, and raises many false alarms. Part of the problem, Stat News reported, is that the algorithm was trained to flag when doctors would submit bills for sepsis treatment, which doesn’t always line up with patients’ first signs of symptoms.
In response, Epic pointed to previous research that found the model can accurately predict sepsis, and argued customers have 'complete transparency' into the model. In an accompanying editorial, medical researchers argue the findings highlight the need for the external validation of proprietary healthcare prediction models before clinical use.
An August 2023 Atrium Health research study found that Epic’s product was more accurate at the highest scoring thresholds, when it was most confident that a patient had sepsis. However, it also found that those thresholds were only reached after clinicians had already taken steps to treat the condition.
Data decay
In February 2022, Stat published the findings of a research study conducted with the Massachusetts Institute of Technology that small shifts in data fed into well-known health care algorithms, including the Epic Sepsis Model can cause their accuracy to degrade over time.
Instead of transforming care, the study found, the algorithms are unable to keep pace with fast-moving clinical conditions, potentially resulting in mis-diagnoses and raising the prospect AI could do more harm than good.
In October 2022, Epic Systems said it had overhauled its sepsis prediction model to improve its accuracy and make its alerts more meaningful to clinicians. It also said it had changed its definition of sepsis to match the international consensus definition.
Operator: Michigan Medical School; Multiple
Developer: Epic Systems
Country: USA
Sector: Health
Purpose: Predict sepsis infection
Technology: Prediction algorithm
Issue: Accuracy/reliability; Safety
Transparency: Governance; Black box; Marketing - misleading
System
Epic Systems (2021). For Clinicians, by Clinicians: Our Take on Predictive Models
Research, advocacy
Schertz A., et al (2023). Sepsis Prediction Model for Determining Sepsis vs SIRS, qSOFA, and SOFA
Wong A., et al (2021). External Validation of a Widely Implemented Proprietary Sepsis Prediction Model in Hospitalized Patients
Habib A.R., et al (2021) The Epic Sepsis Model Falls Short—The Importance of External Validation
Yang J., et al (2022). STAT and MIT rooted out the weaknesses in health care algorithms. Here’s how we did it
News, commentary, analysis
https://www.statnews.com/2021/06/21/epic-sepsis-prediction-tool/
https://www.wired.com/story/algorithm-predicts-deadly-infections-often-flawed/
https://www.theverge.com/2021/6/22/22545044/algorithm-hospital-sepsis-epic-prediction
https://www.healthcareitnews.com/news/research-suggests-epic-sepsis-model-lacking-predictive-power
https://www.statnews.com/2022/02/28/sepsis-hospital-algorithms-data-shift/
https://khn.org/morning-breakout/warnings-over-falling-accuracy-of-health-care-algorithms/
https://www.statnews.com/2022/10/03/epic-sepsis-algorithm-revamp-training/
https://www.statnews.com/2022/10/24/epic-overhaul-of-a-flawed-algorithm/
https://www.beckershospitalreview.com/ehrs/epic-overhauls-sepsis-algorithm.html
Page info
Type: System
Published: February 2022
Last updated: August 2023