A Chicago retiree was wongly arrested and jailed for nearly a year after Chicago Police Department (CPD) officers accused him of shooting and killing a neighbour sitting next door to him in his car on the basis of an 'unreliable' ShotSpotter gunshot detection alert.
66-year-old Michael Williams was accused of shooting 25-year-old Safarian Harring while giving the young man a ride home from a police brutality protest on the basis that video surveillance footage showed Williams’ car stopped at the time and location where police said they knew Herring was shot due to a ShotSpotter alert.
Williams was subsequently sentenced to 38 years in prison, though, in 2021, a motion (pdf) filed by his attorney argued that the company’s algorithms had initially classified the sound as a firework and the location co-ordinates had been altered.
The admission persuaded the prosecutors to withdraw ShotSpotter evidence against Williams and the judge to dismiss the charges.
The experience had a profound impact on Williams, who spent two years in prison for a crime he did not commit. He has spoken publicly about the trauma and stress he experienced during his incarceration and has advocated for greater transparency and accountability in the use of gunshot detection technology in law enforcement.
Williams' case raised concerns about the accuracy and reliability of ShotSpotter and the extent to which SoundThinking may have been altering data to suit its customers. It also highlighted the potential for wrongful convictions and the need for greater scrutiny of forensic evidence in court proceedings.
In addition, it underscored the importance of ensuring that law enforcement agencies and prosecutors are transparent about the limitations of technologies like ShotSpotter, and that they take steps to mitigate these risks in order to prevent miscarriages of justice.
➕ July 2021. Citing Williams' case, VICE News reported that SoundThinking analysts "frequently modify alerts at the request of police departments."
➕ July 2022. The MacArthur Justice Center filed a class-action lawsuit (pdf) on behalf of Williams and two other claimants for mental anguish, loss of income and legal bills. The suit also sought a court order barring the technology’s use in Chicago.
SoundThinking (2022). VICE Media retracts allegations that ShotSpotter altered evidence
Operator: Chicago Police Department
Developer: SoundThinking/ShotSpotter
Country: USA
Sector: Govt - police
Purpose: Detect gunfire
Technology: Gunshot detection system; Deep learning
Issue: Accountability; Accuracy/reliability; Bias/discrimination; Effectiveness/value; Human/civil rights; Transparency
MacArthur Justice Center (2022). Williams v City of Chicago
AP (2023). Confidential document reveals key human role in gunshot tech
AP (2022). Lawsuit: Chicago police misused ShotSpotter in murder case
AP (2022). How AI-powered tech landed man in jail with scant evidence
Vice News (2021). Police Are Telling ShotSpotter to Alter Evidence From Gunshot-Detecting AI
Chicago Office of the Investigator General (2021). OIG finds that ShotSpotter alerts rarely lead to evidence of a gun-related crime and that presence of the technology changes police behavior
https://www.economist.com/united-states/2023/12/27/americas-new-policing-tech-isnt-cutting-crime
https://www.chicagoappleseed.org/2022/08/24/lawsuit-cpd-faulty-evidence-from-shotspotter/
https://www.datasciencecentral.com/shotspotter-ai-at-its-worst/
https://futurism.com/the-byte/man-sues-chicago-ai-wrongly-imprisoned
Page info
Type: Incident
Published: May 2023
Last updated: August 2024