What happened

A parent reported that an iFlyTek AI-powered learning device produced an essay labeling Mao as "narrow-minded" and "intolerant," specifically criticising his role in China's Cultural Revolution, which led to widespread persecution and suffering.

Following the revelation, iFlyTek suspended sales of the device and its shares dropped by 10 percent amidst a major public backlash.

Why it happened

iFlyTek chairman chairman Liu Qingfeng attributed the incident to a supplier's content error and stated that both the supplier and iFlyTek staff faced repercussions for the "oversight".

Criticism of Mao by iFlyTek's device reflects ongoing tensions in China regarding historical narratives and the Communist Party's portrayal of its leaders. While there has been some allowance for limited critique of Mao since his death in 1976, detailed criticisms remain heavily censored. 

The incident highlights the challenges faced by AI systems in adhering to state-sanctioned narratives, particularly when they inadvertently generate content that contradicts official views. 

Additionally, the Chinese government's strict regulations on generative AI further complicate the landscape for companies like iFlyTek, which must navigate between innovation and compliance with censorship laws.