Lovo accused of stealing two voice-over artists' voices
Lovo accused of stealing two voice-over artists' voices
Occurred: 2019-2020
Page published: September 2025
AI startup Lovo has been accused in a class action lawsuit of stealing the voices of two voice-over artists, Paul Skye Lehrman and Linnea Sage, to create an AI voice generator called Genny.
Two artists, Paul Skye Lehrman and Linnea Sage, claim they were misled into providing voice samples through freelance website Fiverr under the impression the recordings would be used solely for internal or academic purposes, rather than commercial AI training or cloning.
They were paid USD 1200 and USD 400, respectively, for reading scripts and were told the recordings would be used internally or for academic purposes.
Years later, they found out their voices were cloned and used publicly without their consent or additional payment. Lehrman discovered that his voice had been used to narrate a YouTube video about Russian military equipment. He also heard himself being interviewed as an AI-generated character on an episode of the Deadline “Strike Talk” podcast.
The lawsuit alleges Lovo sold these cloned voices to thousands of customers for commercial uses such as ads, films, and presentations without proper compensation or permission.
Seeking damages of at least USD 5 million for the class, the actors have accused Lovo of fraud, false advertising and violating their publicity rights.
Lovo refused to comment publicly on the allegations to journalists and others.
It appears Lovo's founders may have sought to exploit known legal loopholes, including relating to licensing and copyright, to use the actors' voices without their knowledge or consent for commercial purposes.
The case raises transparency, ethical and legal concerns about Lono's approach to AI voice cloning, and the honesty, integrity and values of the company's leadership.
More generally, it also the impact of the technology on artists' control over their professional futures and voice rights, and the need for clear, effective regulation to protect creators' rights, ensure ethical AI use, and address potentially widespread unauthorised exploitation of human voices in synthetic media.
The outcome of the Lono case may influence legal precedent and industry standards around AI voice cloning and digital identity rights.
Audio deepfake
Audio deepfake technology, also referred to as voice cloning or deepfake audio, is an application of artificial intelligence designed to generate speech that convincingly mimics specific individuals, often synthesizing phrases or sentences they have never spoken.
Source: Wikipedia 🔗
Developer: Lovo
Country: USA
Sector: Media/entertainment/sports/arts
Purpose: Develop AI voice generator
Technology: Generative AI; Machine learning; Text-to-speech
Issue: Accountability; Autonomy; Human/civil rights; Transparency
NY Civ Rights L § 51 (2022)
Lanham Act
AIAAIC Repository ID: AIAAIC2046