Orbitz dynamic pricing for Mac users receives backlash
Orbitz dynamic pricing for Mac users receives backlash
Occurred: June 2012
Page published: November 2025
Online travel agency Orbitz quietly used a personalisation algorithm to display more expensive hotel options to Mac users compared to PC users, triggering a heated debate over digital price steering, consumer profiling, and algorithmic transparency.
The Wall Street Journal reported that online travel site Orbitz.com was experimenting with a personalisation feature that altered the order of hotel search results based on the customer’s operating system.
According to the Journal, people using Apple Mac computers spent, on average, USD 20 to USD 30 more per night on hotels than those using Windows PCs, and were 40 percent more likely to book a four- or five-star property. Orbitz used this data to "nudge" Mac users toward higher-priced, upscale hotels by prioritising them at the top of searches on its own platform, as well as on affiliated sites like CheapTickets and ebookers.
While Orbitz executives insisted they were not charging different prices for the exact same room, they confirmed they were showing different listings to different users by default. Since 90 percent of customers book a hotel from the first page of results, this algorithmic filtering made it necessary for Mac users to click through more options or manually sort by price to find the cheaper deals that PC users were shown initially.
The result was that Mac users were unknowingly guided to spend more money, potentially causing them to overpay by steering them away from lower-cost options they might have preferred. Orbitz's lack of transparency about this profiling undermined the expectation of a neutral, comprehensive search experience on a retail platform.
The discovery of Orbitz's opaque practice sparked public backlash, accusations of digital redlining and unfair consumer manipulation, and regulatory scrutiny.
The incident was a direct result of Orbitz attempting to maximise revenue by leveraging predictive analytics and demographic data derived from user activity.
Supported by external market research (e.g., Forrester data showing Mac owners generally having higher household incomes), Orbitz’s internal data confirmed an "intuition" that Mac users were a more affluent demographic willing to pay a premium.
The practice was a calculated business decision to increase the value of each booking based on the predicted willingness-to-pay of the customer.
Orbitz implemented its algorithmic steering system without notifying users that their operating system was being used as a factor to filter results, leading to an environment where the consumer could not make an informed choice.
For affected users: The incident highlights how subtle algorithmic design choices can influence spending without explicit price changes, thereby creating hidden inequalities in digital marketplaces.
For society: It illustrates early examples of how profiling and opaque personalisation can lead to discriminatory outcomes, erode trust in online platforms, and set precedents for more sophisticated (and less detectable) forms of behavioural targeting.
For policymakers/regulators: The case continues to serve as a cautionary example for regulators crafting rules and norms for algorithmic transparency, fairness, and responsible AI-driven personalisation.
For Orbitz: The company intially defended its pricing system; however, the widespread negative publicity and the fact that its major competitors (such as Expedia and Priceline) publicly distanced themselves from the practice resulted in it quietly being ceased over time.
Dynamic pricing
Dynamic pricing, also referred to as surge pricing, demand pricing, or time-based pricing, and variable pricing is a revenue management pricing strategy in which businesses set flexible prices for products or services based on current market demands.
Source: Wikipedia 🔗
Developer: Orbitz
Country: USA
Sector: Travel/hospitality
Purpose: Personalise pricing
Technology: Pricing algorithm; Personalisation algorithm; Prediction algorithm
Issue: Accountability; Bias/discrimination; Fairness; Transparency
Consumer Watchdog. Surveillance Price Gouging
AIAAIC Repository ID: AIAAIC2143