British Museum AI-generated "visitors" spark fury
British Museum AI-generated "visitors" spark fury
Occurred: January 2026
Page published: February 2026
The British Museum sparked a public outcry by using AI-generated "visitors" to promote its collections, leading to accusations of devaluing human creativity, reinforcing colonial biases through digital stereotyping, and undermining the trust essential to national cultural institutions.
The British Museum shared a series of Instagram images that appeared to show a young woman engaging with museum displays, including the Aztec fire-serpent Xiuhcoatl.
However, critics quickly noticed the "visitor" was wearing traditional East Asian clothing in some frames and Mexican-style attire in others, depending on the exhibit shown, leading to accusations that the images were AI-generated and not photos of real visitors.
Critics flagged the use of AI imagery without clear disclosure and questioned the appropriateness of using AI-generated representations in place of authentic photographs and accused the museum of insensitive cultural stereotyping.
They also linked the issue to concerns about museums outsourcing creative tasks to automated tools, potentially displacing human photographers, designers, and cultural workers.
People online also criticised the museum for allegedly unfollowing academics and commentators (e.g. an archaeologist who spoke out) after they criticised the post, interpreting this as an attempt to avoid accountability, suppress dissent, and protect the museum's reputation rather than constructively engage with the backlash.
The posts were taken down within hours of their publication.
The incident appears to have been a result of a marketing collaboration with an AI agency that prioritised efficiency over cultural and ethical nuance.
The museum initially characterised the post as "user-generated content," suggesting a failure to vet the ethical implications of AI-created imagery before sharing it on official channels.
For society: the incident raises the question of whether we are willing to accept "automated culture" where human experience is replaced by synthetic simulations. It highlights the risk of "algorithmic colonialism," where AI models trained on Western-centric datasets reproduce stereotypes about the Global South.
For policymakers: there is an urgent need for transparency mandates requiring public institutions to clearly label synthetic media. Additionally, the backlash supports calls for stronger intellectual property protections for artists whose work is often scraped to train these models without consent.
For museums: institutions must develop robust AI ethics guidelines that prioritise human expertise (curators, photographers, and educators) and ensure that digital innovation does not come at the cost of cultural authenticity.
Unknown
Developer:
Country: UK
Sector: Media/entertainment/sports/arts
Purpose: Create marketing images
Technology: Generative AI
Issue: Accountability; Bias/discrimination; Employment; Normalisation; Representation; Transparency
https://evrimagaci.org/gpt/british-museum-faces-backlash-over-ai-images-and-new-plans-526636
https://petapixel.com/2026/02/04/british-museum-deletes-ai-generated-pictures-after-backlash/
https://news.artnet.com/art-world/british-museum-ai-backlash-2742244
https://www.creativebloq.com/ai/i-cant-ignore-the-irony-of-the-british-museums-ai-scandal
AIAAIC Repository ID: AIAAIC2192